March 12, 2009

Join the Federal Knowledge Management Initiative & Federal KM Working Group

Join the Federal Knowledge Management Initiative & Federal KM Working Group

America faces critical challenges today (information overload, brain drain in government, sharing knowledge, automating knowledge, making laws easier to understand, etc.) and enormous opportunities in the years ahead.

I truly believe KM is part of the solution that can help us overcome the challenges and seize the opportunities.

Government and private sector KM executives have united and formed the Federal Knowledge Management Initative to convince our leaders in Congress and the Obama Administration to coordinate, formalize, and centralize America's efforts around knowledge management.

This presentation by Neil Olonoff summarizes the "Federal Knowledge Management Initiative Roadmap." The initiative, begun several months ago by members of the Federal Knowledge Management Working Group, aims to establish an official center for knowledge management in the Federal Government. With this center of operations as a start, the Federal government can begin to foster knowledge sharing practices and culture, build innovation, and find solutions to the Knowledge Retention Crisis. And there is much more to the plan. Learn how you can become a part of this exciting, ambitious new direction for knowledge management in Government, by attending via phone and computer.

Download Federal Knowledge Management Initiative PPT

Join the Federal KM Working Group. No dues are involved. To join the listserv, send a blank e-mail to kmgov-subscribe@list.jpl.nasa.gov

Read the Roadmap on their Wiki page:

http://www.km.gov

Free Webinar by Dr. Leon Kappelman: Enterprise Architecture 101

Free Webinar by Dr. Leon Kappelman: Enterprise Architecture 101

More: http://courses.unt.edu/kappelman 

When: Monday, 16-March 11:30 am to 1:00 pm central

How: Register now at http://solutions.compaid.com/forms/WebinarA20090316?ProcessType=PreReg

Who: by Leon Kappelman, IT Professor at UNT; Chair, SIM Enterprise Architecture Working Group (http://eawg.simnet.org/)

For full details, please see http://courses.unt.edu/kappelman/EA101.pdf
Leon Kappelman 

February 18, 2009

Jobs: RuleBurst / Haley Rules Architect

Jobs: RuleBurst (Haley Rules) Technical Architect

BIZRULES is looking for a Haley Rules Technical Architect *

The Haley Rules Technical Architect manages the design and implementation of the Haley rules engine within the context of the Seibel implementation.  The Haley Rules Technical Architect will design the integration into the target environment.  The Haley Rules Technical Architect should have extensive experience implementing Haley Rules within the Seibel context.

* by "Haley Rules" the client means
- RuleBurst Rule Engine (BRE)
- SoftLaw Rule Engine (BRE) / Expert System (ES) 
- Haley Office Rules
- Haley Expert Rules
- Haley Business Rule Engine (BRE)

This is for a long term project. RULEBURST/SOFTLAW experts anywhere in the world (Australia, UK, Canada, USA, etc.) are welcome to apply for this challenging opportunity! Relocation available for top candidates.

If you are interested and have experience with RULEBURST / SOFTLAW / HALEY RULES contact us or send your resume to

Careers8@BizRules.com

+1 305.994.9510

Jobs: RuleBurst (Haley Rules) Modeler

Jobs: RuleBurst (Haley Rules) Modeler  

BIZRULES is looking for a Haley Rules Modeler *

The Haley Rule Modeler designs and implements the Haley Rules using the Haley data model and rules. The Haley Rule Modeler is expected to have extensive experience implementing the Haley rules engine and should have experience implementing the Haley rules engine in the context of Seibel implementations.

* by "Haley Rules" the client means
- RuleBurst Rule Engine (BRE)
- SoftLaw Rule Engine (BRE) / Expert System (ES) 
- Haley Office Rules
- Haley Expert Rules
- Haley Business Rule Engine (BRE)

This is for a long term project. RULEBURST/SOFTLAW experts anywhere in the world (Australia, UK, Canada, USA, etc.) are welcome to apply for this challenging opportunity! Relocation available for top candidates.

If you are interested and have experience with RULEBURST / SOFTLAW / HALEY RULES contact us or send your resume to

Careers8@BizRules.com

+1 305.994.9510

February 04, 2009

WARNING: CEO's need to wise up and "bail out" of billion dollar IT projects right now

WARNING: CEO's need to wise up and "bail out" of billion dollar IT projects right now

Dear CEO: 

I am sick and tired of reading about billion dollar IT projects that we both know are never going to work, change, or last. It's time to stop the non-sense and use common-sense.

Here's just one example from InformationWeek. California is spending $3,600,000,000 (that's $3.6 BILLION) on these systems:

• Financial system: 11.8 years, $1.6B
• Strategic Offender System: 5.7 years, $416M
• Home Support Services: 10 years, $298M
• Automated Welfare System: 3.8 years, $263M
• Child Welfare System: 7.3 years, $254M
• Motor Vehicles IT Modernization: 6.8 years, $207M
• Consolidate IT Infrastructure: 2.9 years, $191M
• HR System: 6.1 years, $179M
• ERP for Prisons: 4.5 years, $176M 

Do you really want to cut your systems development budget?

Here's how:

Let's say you're planning an 18-month $18 million systems development project. Imagine that's the cost and time for analysis, design, programming, testing, and deployment.

Using business rules, rulebases, rulebased technology, and architecture and engineering principles, we can program that system in 12 months and $12 million. It's that easy.

We can save you 6 months and $6 million just by using rule-based programming languages instead of hard-coding your rules.

If you can tell us exactly what all your business requirements are, and how many business rules you have, well then we can bring your costs down even more.

We can find enough good qualifed experienced out of work programmers right now who are just as cost-effective and as productive as any programmer in any country who would love to work on your project. And they're ready to start as soon as you're ready to save $$$.

When do you want to start saving millions of dollars?

Hurry, you must act now. Call 1-800-SAVE. The first 50 callers will save an additonal $1 million if you call in the next 30 days. You must call before shareholders find out how much you're really spending on systems development.

PS - By the way, for every $1 billion you spend on development, you're spending $5 billion on maintenance. It's time to stop IT non-sense. You must call now!

December 18, 2008

Enterprise architecture is optional

Enterprise architecture is optional 

Obviously there is a cost to creating enterprise architecture (EA) blueprints and models of data, rules, processes, events/schedules, strategy/goals/objectives, policies/procedures, rules, decisions, people, places, things, etc.

Doing EA is expensive. The good news is that EA is optional.

The bad news is that not doing EA is going to be even more expensive later.

Your company must decide which path it will take. Executives need to decide whether or not to do EA. The question of whether to do EA boils down to these three questions...

Read full article

December 12, 2008

Agility Alliance - New open social network connects technology gurus and business masterminds

Agility Alliance - New open social network connects technology gurus and business masterminds

I’d like to reach out and invite all my IT/business friends to join the Agility Alliance, a free online network that helps bring together technology experts and business leaders:

http://www.agilityalliance.org     

The Agility Alliance network is an open social network, for experts, by experts. We’d like to keep it technical, friendly, open, fun, and non-commercial (i.e. no marketeering).

If you are into BRM, BRMS, BPM, BPMS, CRM, SCM, EDM, CEP, etc. there is a group for you. If not, create a group! It's flexbile so you can create your own group, blog, or forum to share with all of us.

If you're a programmer, analyst, designer, architect, engineer, business executive, VP, CTO, or CIO, and you are a leader in your field, or you want to hear what the leading minds in these fields have to say, join the network and become a member of your favorite group.

I hope this network becomes a place to share great ideas, learn from the best, and find "the best of" links to blogs, presentations, videos, and discussions in your favorite topics. Mine, as many of you know, are managing rules and knowledge.

What do you know? Share... Show and tell. This is not the place to sell.

It’s pretty open and flexible, so you can add groups, blogs, photos, slides, videos, chat, links, forums, tutorials, articles, etc. There are individual pages each member can customize, and each member gets his/her own blog (if you want it). You can post articles, templates, links, and add discussions to the forum. Invite your friends and colleagues to join. If you can’t figure out how it works, ask your kids!

Two months ago the idea of building a professional network for rulebase experts and knowledgebase exeprts was first proposed at ORF2008. I loved the idea. I started creating it, but it didn't feel right. Something was missing.

A big problem in our field is that business people talk dollars and IT people talk data. Alignment, or lack thereof is the biggest complaint CIO's have had for years.

Creating a closed network for just the top rule experts in the world was an awesome challenge, but I also wanted CIOs to have access and see what these genuises have to say. Business people need to hear what geeks have to say.

Geeks landed us on the moon; But business people paved the path and led the way.

We all need to bridge the gap between business and technology. I am extremely confident that the Agility Alliance network will help connect business and IT experts.

The time is right to create a network of IT experts and business leaders. The network is just a few days old, so this is just a start.

The rest is up to you.

 

Fred Simkin said:

Rolando:

Here is my take on this.

I think you are dead on in saying that the era of deregulation is at an end and as we both said in our conversation there will be "s**t storm" of regulatory requirements coming down from International, Federal, State and Local authorities designed to constrain and or prevent the excess that have been apparent in the financial services industry. The word transparency has been bandied about on Capitol Hill and I take it to mean that the financial services community will not only have to demonstrate that it has policies, practices, and procedures but that it is following them. The only way to do that is to have systems (manual or automated) which document enterprise rule compliance.

Only when corporate management can sit before the various bodies that will now govern every aspect of their behavior and physically demonstrate that behavior across the enterprise is constrained in compliance with regulatory requirements consistently and completely will trust begin to build again.

You have elucidated the ten steps that need to be taken by the surviving institutions in order to in place the “rule” structures that will insure this outcome.

Nice Job
Fred Simkin
President
Smartfix LLC
732-735-8609

Charles Young said:

Good stuff!

With my Microsoft hat on (I don't work for the company), one possible omission is WF Rules. This is part of Microsoft's WF (and therefore .NET) stack, and is a sequential engine (not Rete). The next version, due 2009, will be significantly re-worked, and will become a first-class WF model alongside state transition, sequential and other forms of workflow, rather than the integrated companion technology which it is today. Microsoft are currently concentrating their rule engine efforts around WF Rules rather than the BRE that ships with BizTalk.

hnb said:

Maybe this distinction can be refined a even a bit more? Obviously a BRMS does not make a DBMS obsolete. The question seems to be, what is 'data' and what is 'knowledge'. A list of users, for example, seems a clear candidate for the database. However, managing users through a BRMS can be very convenient given the right system. In addition, if users are linked to user profiles, it may be less straight-forward to decide what goes in the database, and what goes in the rules system. Do you have any ideas on this?

Rolando Hernandez said:

Gene, Nice to hear from you. Congrats on your new job.

Scott, You were right buddy! I'll send you the photos of the rule bloggers & you w/ John Z. in a few minutes...

All the best, Rolando

outtanames999 said:

I think you're confusing popularity with ranking.

While there may be some connection between the two in Google's algorithms, the one is not the other. A #1 ranking in the serps for a particular search phrase does not indicate how many searches are being made on that search term.

For that you would have to get an approximation from inside a Google adwords account. And your own web server logs can show you how many visitors are coming to your web site by searching for that term in Google and other search engines.

The number of occurances of the search terms on web pages that Google is aware is the number you are showing (e.g. 1.17 million). That is merely the number of pages that contain your search term.

However, since you did not put the search term in quotes ("") the number is very misleading. For example, the actual count of web pages that contain the exact entire phrase "critical challenges facing business today" is reported by Google to be only 12.

In other words, while we don't know how many are searching for this term, we do know that only 12 people on the internet are writing about it on their web pages.

Why does Google report over a million occurances without the quotes? Because some of the individual words occur that many times or more. For example, business and today occur with extremely high frequency.

Rolando said:

Hey James,
I agree totally.

"Expert systems used backward chaining and interogation where rules engines use forward chaining and existing data."

That's what's so cool about expert systems.

"Expert systems tended to run separately while rules engines integrate with corporate systems."

That was the old days, today they both can be connected to your enterprise apps.

"Expert systems tend to talk to people where rules engines talk to systems."

YES!!!! And that is a good thing - so if you want to build a web app that "talks to people", the smart company would use an expert system approach, rather then a rule engine approach.

By the way, with today's BRE and ES tools, you could pretty much build either a "business rules" or an "expert system" type of application.

You know many BRE / ES tools can be used to build either forward or backward chaining rules.

It's been fun, gotta run!

Rolando



Locations of visitors to this page
Add to My Yahoo!